The Agile Retrospective as a Process Improvement Tool Focusing on Business Value Reengineering and Cost Analysis

There is nothing new about associating the Agile Retrospective with Continuous or “Relentless” Improvement. That’s what it is for, that’s why we do it. However, often in the Agile Coaching world, we notice that Retrospective ideas that are “out of” an individual team’s control don’t get any traction. This becomes a missed opportunity for organizational Process Improvement and Business Value Reengineering. It is also a missed opportunity to analyze potential cost savings that could result from addressing the larger organizational impediments that the Agile teams are raising.

Some frameworks do focus on the importance of organization-wide improvements (not just at the team level). It is not as important to focus on exactly “how” root causes external to an Agile team are addressed, but rather that they ARE being addressed “somehow”.

The Retrospective is valuable. The Retrospective is like a corporate health check every 2 weeks (in scrum methodology). Ignoring or deferring the signs of degraded corporate “health” just because a team cannot really solve the problem alone is costly.

We know that one of the questions teams should be asking themselves in a Retrospective is “what is preventing us from delivering value faster”? This question strikes at the core of the fundamental economic justification to invest in Agile teams, because:

Every time we take decisive action on an impediment raised in a Retrospective, whether it be an action internal OR external to the team, we are effectively engaging in business value reengineering, and tangible cost reduction that can be measured (and analyzed).

So, don’t ignore items that are outside of a team’s control to fix. This is where management has to prove their ability to become servant-leaders. The question “What can I do for the team?” becomes simple: “Fix the issues that are slowing the team down, and the entire company will benefit”…

Related Articles

Introducing “Value-Side” Thinking & Decision Making

It is common for corporations to focus on “cost-cutting” measures. While it is an extremely important economic principle to maximize profits by lowering costs, ignoring the impacts of business investment decisions on value creation can be detrimental to the quest for maximum profits. In this light, making cost-based or “cost-side” decisions without adding “value-side” thinking and decision making is not advisable.

Read More »

AGILENOMICS® Newsletter – Winter-Spring 2022


This past June, after meticulous research, we concluded that the next set of AGILENOMICS® online courses will be created with even higher quality animation, improving our course learning experience, while keeping up with trends in industry technology. We have partnered with Panlasigue Consulting LLC to achieve this goal.

Read More »

Beyond the Sprint

Why it is important for an Agile software development team to understand that the work they produce is a corporate investment expected to yield value in the form of an internal process improvement or marketable commodity.

If an Agile software development team is treated merely as a “staff augmentation” line item, and not as a strategic partner in an investment project, there is a high risk that stakeholders will not achieve the results they originally intended – they will not achieve maximum process development / improvement levels, cost savings, or highest possible returns on investment that the business has intended. The teams in such a scenario risk falling into an “order-taking” mindset vs. a more proactive and innovative mindset. If this occurs, the project execution results risk being only marginally better than in a “Waterfall” approach…the return on investment will be low, because sprint over sprint, low-commitment “order-takers” will not succeed in delivering the highest quality of acceptable software…this phenomenon results in reduced value delivered over the duration of the project. In other words, in terms of cost analysis, the company will have just paid for less than they had planned for.

Read More »

AGILENOMICS™ Newsletter – April-May 2020

In our previous Newsletter, we made the following announcement: On March 20th, 2020 the first online course modules were released into the production environment of our website,

While this statement remains true, we opted for a smaller BETA focus group to take the course and get certified, before launching a formal marketing and advertising campaign. We took this approach for several reasons …

Read More »


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *